The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Page 1 of 40 1, 2, 3 ... 20 ... 40  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Zat on Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:17 am

Maybe it's just 'time' Leo.

And I think confreres was the word you were lookin g for.

_________________
W 4 1lb 6 2 1lb | 4 2 2lb 2 2 4 | 1 6 6 4 6
Who cares if it was only t20, it was still a hell of a hitting spree.

Zat


Number of posts: 22080
Age: 100
Reputation: 28
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by JGK on Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:38 am

Leo wrote:Assume we'll get more polls on Monday and Tuesday.

I can't believe the 10% swing in Queensland Newspoll reckons is happening. Just doesn't seem credible. For people to swing that savagely when they are, by all ordinary measures, doing relatively well, would be extraordinary.

Maybe my comperes are nuts?


I think the 2004 result was skewed towards the Libs because of Latham. Bomber wouldn't ahve lost by so much so it isn't really a 10% swing.

_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling - 8 January 2011

JGK


Number of posts: 13322
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Invader Zim on Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:55 am

Aye. Leo really isn't the bright.

_________________
You want me, well ****** well come and find me
I'll be waiting with a gun and a pack of sandwiches

Invader Zim


Number of posts: 5831
Reputation: 33
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Leo on Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:14 am

I wish I were bright enough to figure out what 'the bright' is, so I'd know what it is I'm not. Wink

Anything over 50.5% will be a record result for Labor, so Latham or otherwise, it's still an extraordinary proposition JGK. If it's just parochialism, why swing for Rudd but not for Hayden in 1980?

Though obviously human behaviour doesn't have to make any kind of logical sense.

Leo


Number of posts: 591
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Zat on Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:20 am

Leo wrote:human behaviour doesn't have to make any kind of logical sense.

And we have a winner.

_________________
W 4 1lb 6 2 1lb | 4 2 2lb 2 2 4 | 1 6 6 4 6
Who cares if it was only t20, it was still a hell of a hitting spree.

Zat


Number of posts: 22080
Age: 100
Reputation: 28
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by JGK on Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:31 am

Leo wrote:Though obviously human behaviour doesn't have to make any kind of logical sense.



Aye - 47.5% of Australians still want John Howard as their Prime Minister.

_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling - 8 January 2011

JGK


Number of posts: 13322
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by JGK on Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:10 am

BTW - latest Sportsbet odds:


ALP - 1.20
Coalition - 4.50

_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling - 8 January 2011

JGK


Number of posts: 13322
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by JGK on Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:12 am

And Centrebet have the coaltion at 5.10.

_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling - 8 January 2011

JGK


Number of posts: 13322
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Invader Zim on Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:20 am

I live in a safe Labor seat and have had bugger all election material (apart from the tax payer funded stuff of course), whereas my GF lives in a Lib seat and has been inundated from both sides.

Seems the campaign has been about saving the Liberal heartland for some time now...like Howards cash hand out to the OAPs, and the tax deduction for private school fees.

_________________
You want me, well ****** well come and find me
I'll be waiting with a gun and a pack of sandwiches

Invader Zim


Number of posts: 5831
Reputation: 33
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Invader Zim on Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:52 am

Just worked out she's in Stirling...held by a margin of 2% by the Libs. No wonder both sides are putting money into the seat.

_________________
You want me, well ****** well come and find me
I'll be waiting with a gun and a pack of sandwiches

Invader Zim


Number of posts: 5831
Reputation: 33
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by skully on Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:45 pm

I thought Dello said threads get locked at 990 posts. Testing - this is post no. 1001 in this thread.

skully


Number of posts: 36623
Age: 98
Reputation: 10
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Invader Zim on Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:52 pm

Dello told a porky.

_________________
You want me, well ****** well come and find me
I'll be waiting with a gun and a pack of sandwiches

Invader Zim


Number of posts: 5831
Reputation: 33
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Leo on Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:52 pm

This one makes more sense:

http://www.pollbludger.com/galaxy181107.gif

Interesting to see which is right re magnitude of state swings.

_________________
'Anger ruins joy, steals the goodness of my mind, forces my mouth to say terrible things. Overcoming anger brings peace of mind, leads to a mind without regrets. If I overcome anger, I will be delightful and loved by everyone'

Leo


Number of posts: 591
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Dello on Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:18 pm

skully wrote:I thought Dello said threads get locked at 990 posts. Testing - this is post no. 1001 in this thread.


Just repeating the information I was given by our lovely - and clearly clueless - hosts.

Carry on.

Dello


Number of posts: 13205
Reputation: 24
Registration date: 2007-08-03
Country:

View user profile http://www.flamingbails.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Federal Election Thread - 2007 (part two)

Post by Invader Zim on Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:49 am

More bad polls...

57%? Considering the ALP has never managed more than 53.23% that seems a bit over the top. Would be hella grouse if it happened tho.

It's time.

Invader Zim


Number of posts: 5831
Reputation: 33
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 40 1, 2, 3 ... 20 ... 40  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum