Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
The Flaming Bails Cricket ForumPage 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3 
Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by tac on Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:01 pm
In an attempt to clarify the second best team in the world by looking at rankings in Tests, ODI and T20, Timmy comes to the following conclusion:
FFS! If you want to read more of his crap . . .
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/columns/content/current/story/315654.html
We can tentatively conclude that Australia are the best team in the world, despite being mediocre at Twenty20. India, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand and England really are much of a muchness
FFS! If you want to read more of his crap . . .
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/columns/content/current/story/315654.html
tac
- Number of posts: 18844
Reputation: 5
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country:
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by JGK on Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:10 pm
For a guy who knows fark all about cricket, he really has a great job.
_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling: 8 January 2011
"Let the sun shine in"
JGK
- Number of posts: 13921
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by Zat on Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:27 pm
He'd fit right in here...
_________________
W 4 1lb 6 2 1lb | 4 2 2lb 2 2 4 | 1 6 6 4 6
Who cares if it was only t20, it was still a hell of a hitting spree.
Zat
- Number of posts: 22578
Age: 100
Reputation: 29
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country: -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by taipan on Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:29 pm
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/columns/content/current/story/315654.html[/quote[/url]]tac wrote:In an attempt to clarify the second best team in the world by looking at rankings in Tests, ODI and T20, Timmy comes to the following conclusion:We can tentatively conclude that Australia are the best team in the world, despite being mediocre at Twenty20. India, Sri Lanka, South Africa, Pakistan, New Zealand and England really are much of a muchness
FFS! If you want to read more of his crap . . .
[url=http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/columns/content/current/story/315654.html
I have proof that Karti did the research.
taipan
- Number of posts: 21275
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-08-31 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by Anniyan on Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:09 pm
He's just being Patronising!
_________________
When Bill Gates walks into a bar, the average net worth of the patrons rises by a few Billion Dollars, but that doesn't mean that the typical patron of the bar has got a Billion Dollars.
Anniyan
- Number of posts: 926
Age: 32
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-08
Country:
-
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by S F Barnes on Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:13 pm
Anniyan wrote:He's just being Patronising!
Well, his pulling Australia's collective plonker IMO.
S F Barnes
- Number of posts: 276
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-08-31 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by furriner on Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:28 am
In that case he's been successful.
furriner
- Number of posts: 7388
Reputation: 8
Registration date: 2007-09-04 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by tac on Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:56 am
Why's that, furry? His piece is poorly argued whether it be a wind-up or not. Bit like one of your posts, in fact.
tac- Number of posts: 18844
Reputation: 5
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country: -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by taipan on Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:05 am
tac wrote:Why's that, furry? His piece is poorly argued whether it be a wind-up or not. Bit like one of your posts, in fact.
That's pushing it a bit.
taipan- Number of posts: 21275
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-08-31 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by Henry on Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:10 am
Perhaps he's just trying to provide an alternate, interesting viewpoint to it all? Cricket is meant to be fun, after all. So whats wrong with having a bit of fun with ratings and statistics? Lighten up you lot.
Henry
- Number of posts: 12208
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country:
-
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by taipan on Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:17 am
Henry wrote:Perhaps he's just trying to provide an alternate, interesting viewpoint to it all? Cricket is meant to be fun, after all. So whats wrong with having a bit of fun with ratings and statistics? Lighten up you lot.
Like Karti you mean?
taipan- Number of posts: 21275
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-08-31 -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by Henry on Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:28 am
I dont know why the Aussies are wound up- He still concluded that all things considered they were the worlds best team.
Henry- Number of posts: 12208
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country: -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by tac on Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:26 am
Who's wound up? I'm just commenting on his poor methodology in coming to his feeble conclusion. A total waste of 3 mins reading time.
tac- Number of posts: 18844
Reputation: 5
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country: -
Re: Only Tim deLisle could manage it . . .
by please don't yell on Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:29 am
he's just a piss poor cricket writer, although reading his whingy crap during the ashes did make 5-0 a bit sweeter.
please don't yell
- Number of posts: 1138
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-06 -
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» Rare insight & understanding from an unexpected source
» England v Australia at The Oval - Aug 20-23 (III)
» F**K you Pakistan Cricket
» Glossary Update
» Rugby Tri Series
» Rugby Leeeeg 2010
» Golf - for anyone who GAF
» OT: What book are you reading at the moment?