India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Page 41 of 46 Previous  1 ... 22 ... 40, 41, 42 ... 46  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Merlin on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:33

Red wrote:
Merlin wrote:Yesssssssssssssssss!!!
Result !!
Played the Saffers.
Yet another collection from Coral's !! Very Happy


You owe Steyn a kiss from cleaning up the tail again and saving your bacon. Smile

Shocked
Steady on old girl ... I might condescend to buy him a pint when next he's at Lord's!

Nice tits, by the way!

Merlin


Number of posts: 11687
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-09-05
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Red on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:44

So will that van Zyl character the caretaker coach get to have the job on a more permanent basis?

_________________
"Cricket requires one to assume such indecent postures."
-Oscar Wilde

Red


Number of posts: 6017
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Henry on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 12:49

As soon as Rohit got injured Dhoni should have given up the gloves and played as a specialist batsman.

India just weren't ready for what South Africa threw at them.

Henry


Number of posts: 12222
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by mynah on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:30

Red wrote:So will that van Zyl character the caretaker coach get to have the job on a more permanent basis?
No, wrong colour.

mynah



Number of posts: 2492
Reputation: 2
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by JGK on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:35

SG wrote:Amla declared MoM.

Absolutely silly.

Steyn was the difference between the 2 sides.



Aye. Kallis was ahead of Amla anyway.

_________________
Date on which I can start criticising Ponting's captaincy and Hauritz's bowling: 8 January 2011


"Let the sun shine in"

JGK


Number of posts: 13931
Reputation: 4
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by DJ_Smerk on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:49

Well done, SAF. Outstanding cricket.

_________________
holy-sheep

DJ_Smerk


Number of posts: 13521
Age: 23
Reputation: 6
Registration date: 2007-09-08
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Brass Monkey on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 13:55

W-ouch! Whatta drubbing.

Sree must be a better prospect.

Poor batting in parts.

That deck was deader than a doornail.

Brass Monkey


Number of posts: 16211
Age: 101
Reputation: 27
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile Http://www.enkiuk.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Henry on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 14:23

Amla must be the most underrated batsman in world cricket, with Duminy being the most overrated.

Henry


Number of posts: 12222
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-08-31
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by JKLever on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 14:24

Has bucky updated his ICC table yet?

_________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-1,0-5,2-1.... clearly just a blip

JKLever


Number of posts: 23097
Reputation: 14
Registration date: 2007-08-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Brass Monkey on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 14:37

I'm begging him, please don't!

I didn't even mind that he'd got the table up (even though he thought it was rubbing it in people's faces) - it's the fact he had so little class, he couldn't have just snipped the top bit off which outlined India as #1 but he had to have the whole f*cking table!!!!! Pissed me rightoff!

Brass Monkey


Number of posts: 16211
Age: 101
Reputation: 27
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile Http://www.enkiuk.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by furriner on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 15:20

Well done SA. We wuz outclassed.

furriner


Number of posts: 7388
Reputation: 8
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by buckSH on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 17:11

going with 2 seamers again for the second test will yield similar results as this one. If Ishant is rested then Mithun has to come in for sure.

didn't sree just injure his hamstring only 2 weeks ago. He will not be able to do long spells so soon. Mithun should have played in this test instead of Saha. If murali Vijay is compared to laxman then laxman was never 3 down. Badrinath still looks raw and the 3 slot yearns for Dravid.

a lot of fundamental, tactical errors took congruence in this test match.

Dhoni's dropping of Mishra in the second bangladesh test sent the wrong vibes throughout the team and divided it into Dhoni and Sehwag camps. Though it may not have made any difference in individual performances, Sehwag unnecesarily blew it at throwing his bat at each and every of Parnell's wide deliveries. I think he was determined not to help Dhoni out of trouble this time around.

Also Tendulkar's worries grew because he missed the familiar calm reassurance of Dravid or Laxman at the other end.

bcci surely missed someone like bell lower down the order who could have countered steyn. Instead the likes of Saha, and other lower order bats always gave away their wicket too easily to steyn throwing the whole team out of balance.

Ishant look uninterested to bowl according to accounts. He may well be disinterested because of pitches prepared always to suit spinners do not help his confidence. He will go down in pace and confidence as time goes if he plays more in India. To boost his confidence and support, he always needs to be covered adequately by 2 senior seamers, either Munaf or Sree. Now then Ishant may or may not perform but the advantage is that he will not slacken so much on pace when he knows that his quota of overs is that much reduced by presence of additional seamer. One of the seamers will always underperform in a 3 seamer attack but that is only to be expected and should not be used against the 3 seamer combination.

Debutants should only be blooded in a winning team and they must not be made part of a losing venture. It has to be avoided as much as possible. Also the idea of introducing 3 debutant batsman while playing a team like South Africa is also quite silly and showed unnecessary overconfidence in these debutants to tackle the likes of steyn on Indian pitches, without quite realizing that steyn relies on pace and late movement and it isn't always possible for a debutant to tackle late movement at the first go.

major tactical errors were made by dhoni, when he failed to manage the spinners who repeatedly failed to toss up the ball and relied to ball flattish deliveries in order to restrict the batsman. These spinners or tossers were more interested in preserving their stats than working towards the interest of the team. harbhajan and mishra were feeding off each others negativity and refused to toss up the ball or give it more air thus giving Kallis and Amla enough time to settle themselves. Kallis is a relatively tall batsman and was quite comfortably able to get on top of the flattish deliveries by the spinners.

in fact the entire team played a negative self-preserving line taking que from Dhoni's Ojha gamble in the second test in bangladesh thus setting down a negative trend for the first time in Dhoni's captaincy. He not only quite clearly overplayed his hand by playing petty politics against Sehwag but also made the team more cynical overall in their approach.

buckSH



Number of posts: 2224
Age: 46
Reputation: -1
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by Basil on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 18:09

Well played SA.

Oh dear India!

Basil


Number of posts: 8792
Age: 51
Reputation: 9
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by taipan on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 18:10

Red wrote:So will that van Zyl character the caretaker coach get to have the job on a more permanent basis?


The word on the street is that Wessels will get the gig.

_________________
*Batman* wrote:
Don't keep discussing me you loser qunt!

taipan


Number of posts: 21275
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Post by taipan on Tue 09 Feb 2010, 18:12

buckSH wrote:Debutants should only be blooded in a winning team and they must not be made part of a losing venture..


Um, aren't India no 1 on the BCCI ICC tables?

_________________
*Batman* wrote:
Don't keep discussing me you loser qunt!

taipan


Number of posts: 21275
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 41 of 46 Previous  1 ... 22 ... 40, 41, 42 ... 46  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum