Re: Modi - Gawn-ish...

by Merlin on Tue 27 Apr 2010, 20:38

horace wrote:I still do not understand how a person of Modi's dubious past (the US convictions) could have been allowed to usurp so much power..

Easy.
Anything goes in BanIndia, providing palms (and/or arses) are greased and the torch of publicity is constant.
It's the new "democracy" donchaknow!

btw warnie has denied he was involved in MF

Pardon!!

Que MF ??!!

by tac on Tue 27 Apr 2010, 20:41

Match-fixing . . .or Milf-fu.cking . . .

by Merlin on Tue 27 Apr 2010, 20:48

tac wrote:Match-fixing . . .or Milf-fu.cking . . .

Ah!
Merci mon ami ....I figured mudda ...sumptin' !
Mind you. I wouldn't put it past Warne to be involved in any one or all of the three options.

by tac on Tue 27 Apr 2010, 20:52

Merlin Flummoxed . . .

by Merlin on Tue 27 Apr 2010, 20:56

Careful ..... Cool

by taipan on Wed 28 Apr 2010, 10:26

tac wrote:Merlin Flummoxed . . .

Middlesexed?

by lardbucket on Wed 28 Apr 2010, 10:30

Have I ever mentioned that Modi is a shallow, corrupt, criminal, self-serving, publicity-seeking, overblown, superficial, corrupt, lying, snivelling, qunt?

He remains perfectly qualified to run T20 cricket in India.

by tac on Wed 28 Apr 2010, 10:31

He'd fit in here . . . if Nigel ever decided to leave us . . .

by taipan on Wed 28 Apr 2010, 10:33

Or if garry ever decided to run

by Merlin on Wed 28 Apr 2010, 10:40

It's gone awful quiet on here from the "Hail Lalit Modi the Saviour of Worldwide Cricket" BanIndian posters !

Funny that!

by doremi on Thu 29 Apr 2010, 05:14

Just a little experiment to see whether you'd follow the example and go awful quiet too. Apparently not.

by Merlin on Thu 29 Apr 2010, 05:17

doremi wrote:Just a little experiment to see whether you'd follow the example and go awful quiet too. Apparently not.

Nothing to hide from doughboy ... but welcome back nonetheless.