Re: Bung - Serious, or a prick teaser? May be gone for wt20

by skully on Wed 14 Apr 2010, 23:07

And before anyone corrects me, yes, Bung's two length - sh!t and sh!tter - period after his 2001 comeback did last most of the rest of his career. There was a brief period around about when Pidg retired that he stepped up for a while.

by horace on Thu 15 Apr 2010, 12:44

droll

by taipan on Thu 15 Apr 2010, 18:58

Is it possible to quantify references to players on here?

Bung must be the winner by a country mile, seeing as Red doesn't post much any more.

by horace on Sun 18 Apr 2010, 12:22

seems that Hampshire are in negotiations for Bung's services...thatnk heavens I barrack for the Yprkies

by Chivalry Augustus on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 02:27

Bung's a total fudge packer.

THIS FORUM IS DEAD.

by Zat on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 11:34

horace wrote:seems that Hampshire are in negotiations for Bung's services...thatnk heavens I barrack for the Yprkies

and drink during the day, it seems...

by tac on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 11:38

he's typing with his colostomy bag . . .makes more sense but is a bit harder to decipher . . .

by horace on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 16:27

phurt...

by the way the irrepressible bung is in the news - saying he is ready for the world cup...the busted thumb is not a worry and that he is in fine fettle..the 0/149 cumulative result from his IPL stint is no pointer to his form as he was a bit unlucky

by skully on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 16:33

If Thicky Ricky has even a mg of a brain cell, he will have Bung carrying the drinks other than for matches v dreg sides.

Do the minnows play in the T20 Gilly? You know, Netherlands, Kenya, Ireland etc?

by Zat on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 16:53

Ireland and Afghanistan this time around. How could you forget the Dutchies giving the Poms a black eye at the last t20 masturthon?

by Zat on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 16:56

The wt20 is where the ICC should be having 16 teams, not the WC.

by tac on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 17:07

sage from zatts . . .

by Zat on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 17:43

Which is why it won't happen, it makes too much sense.

by skully on Wed 21 Apr 2010, 18:11

Zat wrote:The wt20 is where the ICC should be having 16 teams, not the WC.

So just 12 then?

The ICC 10 + Ireland and the Afghans?? FFS Rolling Eyes