Bannies v subis

Page 2 of 15 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8 ... 15  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by furriner on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:21

embee wrote:Have you learned to type in Horrie , Furrbag?


Very rough and off the cuff translation:

The Sheikh can go to Mecca; me, I'm off to England
He can go see the House of God, I'm for the wonders* the good Lord made

*meaning Wine, women, song etc

furriner


Number of posts: 8521
Reputation: 19
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by embee on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:33

Sounds like something Horrie would say

embee


Number of posts: 15116
Reputation: 82
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by horace on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:45

furri continues to make great sense

horace


Number of posts: 17087
Age: 102
Reputation: 11
Registration date: 2007-09-05
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by skully on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:55

See, furri comes in with some humour, while other twats come in their blow up girlfriends.

If only some of the other Bannies could take a leaf out of the furrster's book.

skully


Number of posts: 53686
Age: 100
Reputation: 91
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by tac on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:58

phurt . . . i bet furry's got a jar of whitening cream in his bathroom . . .

tac


Number of posts: 19233
Reputation: 14
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Zat on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 21:48

buckSH wrote:plz don't try too hard ..

I'm sure you'll tell us if we do, because you are the forum tryhard, and as such, an expert on such things

_________________
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent - Thomas Jefferson

Zat


Number of posts: 28093
Age: 102
Reputation: 64
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by buckSH on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 22:15

If you say so ..

buckSH


Number of posts: 2276
Age: 47
Reputation: -6
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by Fred Nerk on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 22:44

Dunno what I'd call most Indians - I suppose it's up to them - but I see nothing wrong with 'curry stain on the shirtfront of Humanity' for the likes of Batty and Buckwit.

Fred Nerk



Number of posts: 4142
Reputation: 8
Registration date: 2007-10-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by buckSH on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 22:48

>> 'curry stain on the shirtfront of Humanity'

so many folks love curry .. i take it as a compliment.

then again I am in love .. i can see no evil ..

buckSH


Number of posts: 2276
Age: 47
Reputation: -6
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by philcric on Mon 15 Mar 2010, 23:29

skully wrote:A very harmless abbreviating of "subcontinental teams" i.e. "subis" was created some years back (can't even remember if it was on C4 or here at FB) but the more humourless of our subcontinental buddies decided that they'd deem "subis" a "racist" epithet, even though it was merely a far simpler thing to type than the full 19 letter full term.

Is it inevitable that "Bannies" will suffer the same unfair treatment?


http://www.flamingbails.com/the-flaming-bails-cricket-forum-f1/is-subi-an-acceptable-term-t1445.htm

philcric


Number of posts: 1601
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by The One on Tue 16 Mar 2010, 02:14

there are 15 aussies on the board?

The One


Number of posts: 7168
Reputation: -42
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by taipan on Wed 17 Mar 2010, 08:56

skully wrote:See, furri comes in with some humour, while other twats come in their blow up girlfriends.

If only some of the other Bannies could take a leaf out of the furrster's book.


Agreed, you farking Aussie.

Does that make Aussie a racial term?

taipan


Number of posts: 28149
Age: 111
Reputation: 51
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by eowyn on Wed 17 Mar 2010, 09:24

My name is Angela shortened to Ang or Ange, some people call me Angie, I politely tell them that I don't like being called that. Most people accept that easliy only people who think they are being highly 'amusing' carry on calling me Angie.

I have never used the term "subi", I see no need to use it. People from the Subcontinent have, on the most part, said quite politely that they don't liike the term. Why continue to offend people in that way? Telling them to accept it because you say it's not offensive? This place is supposed to be a community of people who like cricket and also have other things in common they discuss, why deliberately offnd a part of that community?

I have noticed that it's a few die-hards who continue to use the term as if to prove a point, (mainly Aussies and the odd Saffie, which may say quite a lot) and waht point does it prove anyway? Just try and get with the few decent people that remain here would seem to be a good starting point.

eowyn


Number of posts: 10305
Reputation: 32
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by taipan on Wed 17 Mar 2010, 09:31

eowyn wrote:My name is Angela shortened to Ang or Ange, some people call me Angie, I politely tell them that I don't like being called that. Most people accept that easliy only people who think they are being highly 'amusing' carry on calling me Angie.

I have never used the term "subi", I see no need to use it. People from the Subcontinent have, on the most part, said quite politely that they don't liike the term. Why continue to offend people in that way? Telling them to accept it because you say it's not offensive? This place is supposed to be a community of people who like cricket and also have other things in common they discuss, why deliberately offnd a part of that community?

I have noticed that it's a few die-hards who continue to use the term as if to prove a point, (mainly Aussies and the odd Saffie, which may say quite a lot) and waht point does it prove anyway? Just try and get with the few decent people that remain here would seem to be a good starting point.


Well some might note that Paki is an acceptable term in Aus (per a few Aussie posters here). Why is it racial in England?

To me it has always been a geographical term. Same as Aussie and Saffie.

taipan


Number of posts: 28149
Age: 111
Reputation: 51
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bannies v subis

Post by DJ_Smerk on Wed 17 Mar 2010, 09:34

Just for the record, I hate the word "Paki".

If it's said in a bad tone, it's disgusting.

DJ_Smerk


Number of posts: 15484
Age: 24
Reputation: 20
Registration date: 2007-09-08
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 15 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8 ... 15  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum