India v SA, 1st Test, Nagpur, Feb 6-10

Weren't they suppose to play 3 vs the Poms but the

For Indian eyes only

Spoiler:

Invasion of Mumbai by Pakistan

For Pakistani eyes only

Spoiler:

terrorist attacks on Mumbai by Indians pretending to be Pakistan ...and if you are indian and reading this you can't deny that Indians don't pretend they are Pakistani

For everyone else's eyes

Spoiler:

bunch of subi's killing other subis and causing all the racists on the forum to crack jokes at the poor subi's expense ...and if you are an Indian reading this you really should get some comprehension lessons ...Victorian Universities have a special on for Indian Students at the moment if you're interested

caused them to postpone and only play two

Fark it. Another episode ruined by Spoilers.

You didn't have to click'em, you silly spiv.

I'm weak I tells ya, weaaaaaakkk, when it comes to spoilers.

me too lol lol

embee wrote:Weren't they suppose to play 3 vs the Poms but the

For Indian eyes only

Spoiler:

Invasion of Mumbai by Pakistan

For Pakistani eyes only

Spoiler:

terrorist attacks on Mumbai by Indians pretending to be Pakistan ...and if you are indian and reading this you can't deny that Indians don't pretend they are Pakistani

For everyone else's eyes

Spoiler:

bunch of subi's killing other subis and causing all the racists on the forum to crack jokes at the poor subi's expense ...and if you are an Indian reading this you really should get some comprehension lessons ...Victorian Universities have a special on for Indian Students at the moment if you're interested

caused them to postpone and only play two

Forum gold, you Aussie jackass.

India's unbeaten for 14 tests run was good while it lasted. Now this test has given us an indication of how dark the future is if we can't have batsmen who can play pace or swing. Feck, but half the 'young talent' even struggles against spin.

Previous records of India for being unbeaten for most tests:



So Azharuddin was more successful than Dhoni in winning more tests in the same situation. Of course they were all home wins apart from one in Lanka.

Yeah, but it was always going to be the case. Take a couple of batsmen out and you're back to normal. I'd fancy the shitheap-that-is-England's chances at home sans Dravid and Latchman.

we went 31 tests without a win in the 70s and 80s, so its not all bad

Brass Monkey wrote:Yeah, but it was always going to be the case. Take a couple of batsmen out and you're back to normal. I'd fancy the shitheap-that-is-England's chances at home sans Dravid and Latchman.

Considering the joke that our bowling is, you many fancy your chances (both home/away) even when Indian team consists of these 2 gentlemen.

Nah, you'd bat us out of the game by mercilessly tanking Jimmy and Broad - with the adept play against spin, Swann wouldn't even be able to gain us control. Then our ADHD batsmen would piss it all away.

Swann is the best spinner in world cricket. Don't say anything bad about him.

I just love the way he bowls, he bats, the way he conducts himself on the field. Easily my favorite Eng cricketer.

BTW, what is ADHD?

Just curious to know.

Further on Swann, if we couldn't even get Harris away at home then we don't stand a chance against Swann (world's best spinner).

Wonder why Eng took so long to pick him in Eng team. Monty is sh!t when compared to him.

He did what no Indian spinner ever did in SA. Tie SA batsmen in knots. Even Kumble was helpless on SA pitches save 1 or 2 spells.

PS: Swann is immense.