South Africa v England, 4th Test, Jo’burg, Jan 14-18

skully wrote:

Zat wrote:

skully wrote:

Zat wrote:

embee wrote:I saw Invictus last night ...and Feb 11 1990 was the date they used as his release

That'd be 20 years then.

Hehehe. Is it yesterday in Perth?

3 hours time difference, give or take a decade or two.

The common bond of brotherhood between Banjos and Wozzies.

Do Wozzies wear white shoes?

Some Wozzies, that should be...

Zat wrote:

skully wrote:I feel sorry for the boy twins who got called Winnie.

Anyone ever established Bucky's real name?

Slinky Rawhide?

That would be a good name for a toy spring made by the king of leathergoods.

It's probably been done, but that won't stop Farks bullsh!tting about it, and claiming it's his.

Well his Californian family owned Australian leathergoods company could make them by the thousand.

But I thought he was just the company's Web site flunky.

well, he is 6'4" and 380 kg, so he probably sits in the back room looking up porn, occasionally changing the site, and eating twinkies by the boxful.

Now don't be unfair, Zog. I'm sure if he checks his weight tomorrow he'll tip out at 86 kg. Easy mistake to make.

skully wrote:

embee wrote:I saw Invictus last night ...and Feb 11 1990 was the date they used as his release

How were the Saffie accents?

most were passable to my ear ...A saffie might think different

And as a Rugby-themed show?

Zat wrote:well, he is 6'4" and 380 kg, so he probably sits in the back room looking up porn, occasionally changing the site, and eating twinkies by the boxful.

I reckon he might be dyslexic

4 foot 6 and 120 pounds

Belf?

skully wrote:And as a Rugby-themed show?

The rugby scenes were minor as the games themselves in the 95 WC didnt lend themselves to Hollywoodisation (ie impossible come from behind wins or super duper trick plays but they made them as exciting as a penalty and drop goal-a thon can be )

The trailers just didn't appeal to me. Worth a look?