No balled for throwing

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

No balled for throwing

Post by taipan on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:20

Was looking for something else and chanced upon this.

No-balled for throwing in tests
Bowler
E Jones Aus v Eng Melbourne 1898
GAR Lock Eng v WI Kingston 1954
G Griffin RSA v Eng Lord's 1960
Haseeb Ahsan Pak v Ind Bombay 1960
I Meckiff Aus v RSA Brisbane 1963
Abid Ali Ind v NZ Christchurch 1968
SMH Kirmani Ind v WI Bridgetown 1983
DI Gower Eng v NZ Nottingham 1986
H Olonga Zim v Pak Harare 1995
M Muralitharan SL v Aus Melbourne 1995
GW Flower Zim v NZ Bulawayo 2000

taipan


Number of posts: 29871
Age: 111
Reputation: 56
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Bradman on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:22

Gower's was deliberate.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by skully on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:24

The list would be a lot longer only for that soft-c0cked "15 degrees of bend" committee. Mad

skully


Number of posts: 56751
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by taipan on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:25

The interesting thing that is excluding Gower only 10 have ever been called, which makes the fuss over MM all the more ridiculous.

taipan


Number of posts: 29871
Age: 111
Reputation: 56
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Bradman on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:27

taipan wrote:The interesting thing that is excluding Gower only 10 have ever been called, which makes the fuss over MM all the more ridiculous.


I guarantee all those umps who called the 'ten' (sounds like the Citadel) would've called Murali the minute he delivered his first ball.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by taipan on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:29

If he had been banned, like he should have been, there would be a lot less crap today.

taipan


Number of posts: 29871
Age: 111
Reputation: 56
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by skully on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:31

taipan wrote:If he had been banned, like he should have been, there would be a lot less crap today.

Farkin oath. The ICC is a bloody disgrace and has turned the art of offspin bowling into a farce.

skully


Number of posts: 56751
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Zat on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:33

IIRC Gower's was a classic. He was hit for four off the only delivery, which was called a no-ball in the days when no-ball sundries weren't added to a bowler's analysis. His figures were 0-0-4-0.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent - Thomas Jefferson

Zat


Number of posts: 28562
Age: 102
Reputation: 73
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Zat on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:41

Gower never bowled in Test cricket again after that, either.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent - Thomas Jefferson

Zat


Number of posts: 28562
Age: 102
Reputation: 73
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Bradman on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 22:50

Zat wrote:Gower never bowled in Test cricket again after that, either.


When this bullshit rule first came out I would've got some no-hoper bowler ( Hayden probably) to ping an over as the umps could only have reported him. If he was suspended forever from bowling after a review it would've been no loss but proven a point.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by skully on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 23:07

Bradman wrote:
Zat wrote:Gower never bowled in Test cricket again after that, either.


When this bullshit rule first came out I would've got some no-hoper bowler ( Hayden probably) to ping an over as the umps could only have reported him. If he was suspended forever from bowling after a review it would've been no loss but proven a point.

Awesome strategy, qmy. WTF didn't you think of it at the time??? cheers

skully


Number of posts: 56751
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by ten years after on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 23:17

A year earlier Gower was the captain responsible for the only occasion of a bowler being noballed for bowling bodyline. Aus v Leics 1975 at Grace Road. Gower set a field with 4 short legs, Agnew bowled a bouncer and Billy McDermott looked rather puzzled as it sailed harmlessly over his shoulder and the umpire dutifully called 'no ball'.

Gower and Agnew are well known practical jokers of course and Bodyline was on TV at the time.

Unless my memory is playing tricks Thommo also made an unusual contribution to that match by bowling about 20 no balls in an innings. He eventually got upset after about the 10th ball in one over and bowled from 30 yards. The umpire promptly called no ball. I gathered afterwards it was because he couldn't tell if Thommo bowled from too wide of the crease.

ten years after


Number of posts: 1210
Reputation: 2
Registration date: 2007-09-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by skully on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 23:26

Nice tidbit, tya. Cool

skully


Number of posts: 56751
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by Bradman on Tue 29 Dec 2009, 23:55

skully wrote:
Bradman wrote:
Zat wrote:Gower never bowled in Test cricket again after that, either.


When this bullshit rule first came out I would've got some no-hoper bowler ( Hayden probably) to ping an over as the umps could only have reported him. If he was suspended forever from bowling after a review it would've been no loss but proven a point.

Awesome strategy, qmy. WTF didn't you think of it at the time??? cheers



I did. Unfortunately I wasn't the Aussie captain then. More's the pity. We would've won a all the series we lost.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: No balled for throwing

Post by tac on Wed 30 Dec 2009, 00:04

Bradman wrote:
skully wrote:
Bradman wrote:
Zat wrote:Gower never bowled in Test cricket again after that, either.


When this bullshit rule first came out I would've got some no-hoper bowler ( Hayden probably) to ping an over as the umps could only have reported him. If he was suspended forever from bowling after a review it would've been no loss but proven a point.

Awesome strategy, qmy. WTF didn't you think of it at the time??? cheers



I did. Unfortunately I wasn't the Aussie captain then. More's the pity. We would've won a all the series we lost.


Yeah, bradders . . . . clown

tac


Number of posts: 19233
Reputation: 15
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum