Global Warming

every single climate model out there has been shown to be wrong

True enough. None of thm predicted the current flattening of temperatures this decade. One would have thought that might cause some toquery their validy for predicting 150 years hence, but apparently not. Instead, we get things like 'warmist decade on record' duh well, yeah. Over 150 years, we know that! When you're a hill you stay high even if you take a few steps down! But 150 years is irrelevant, that was a low point in global temperatures as we came out of the mini ice age. Bound to go up from there

you have to believe in yourself then.

this will prove whey the entire thing is a con-job by a few oligarchs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8387737.stm

"The extrapolar glaciation of the Earth will be decaying at rapid, catastrophic rates - its total area will shrink from 500,000 to 100,000 square kilometres by the year 2350," Mr Kotlyakov's report said.

Mr Cogley says it is astonishing that none of the 10 authors of the 2007 IPCC report could spot the error and "misread 2350 as 2035".

The Green Hypocrites: Prince Charles and Gordon Brown take separate jets... to lecture the world on global warming....

Prince Charles and Gordon Brown were accused last night of ‘green hypocrisy’ after jetting into Copenhagen to lecture the world about global warming.
Charles used the £1,019-an-hour Queen’s Flight so he could deliver a keynote speech to the climate change conference, flying back after less than three hours.
The Prime Minister chartered a 185-seat Airbus to take him and 20 aides to Denmark for their four-day trip.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1236249/The-Green-Hypocrites-Prince-Charles-Gordon-Brown-separate-jets--lecture-world-global-warming.html#ixzz0Zw7lA1m5

Since its now universally acepted by politicians that global warming is the single biggest threat to mankind ever - even though there's no concrete evidence - the conference in Copenhagen should be discussing practical measures to seriously reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

They could start by reverting to putting lead back into petrol. That would svae something like 15 - 17 million tonnes of greenhouse gases per year just in the EU.

Yes, we'd all have to get rid of our catalytic convertors and have our engines retuned at vast expense - but hey, it's only money. It didn't bother them when they railroaded through the legislation banning leaded petrol on the basis of duff science did it ?

Given that they like the idea of diesel over petrol - because it puts out less CO2, I doubt they would think that through either.

Diesel only puts out less CO2 because it's a less efficient engine, and doesn't burn as well. So instead it pumps out unburnt carbon (soot), Nox, Carbon Monoxide, various other carcinogenic gases and chemicals, and is an all round health hazard, which even the UN regards as exceptionally dangerous to health. But oh no, let's punish the cleaner, less damaging petrol engines instead.

Even if Global Warming is happening, the geopolitical environment makes it impossible to fix so we may as well die in comfort.

aye well they shafted us up the arse over that too, didn't they?

Spent a fortune telling us that diesel was better - and so taxed it less ...... until sales of diesel cars rocketed - especially in the larger engines, then surprise surprise - the tax went up. None of us saw that coming did we GRRRRRRRRR. Wankers.

JGK wrote:Even if Global Warming is happening, the geopolitical environment makes it impossible to fix so we may as well die in comfort.

Possibly the sagest post on this thread.