The bleeding obvious?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by buckSH on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 03:52

furriner wrote:
Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.


Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?


the mafia boss may have 50 guns, but you still gotta take him out if he crosses the line.

moreover I do not think the majority of those nukes are high tonnage, most will be tactical battlefield types only. With a few being 10kt or so.
they don't have the testing history or research/industrial base to build high output fission devices.

India is an impotent and soft nation, and incapable of protecting their citizens both within and outside.

buckSH


Number of posts: 2277
Age: 48
Reputation: -6
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by furriner on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 04:08

JKLever wrote:
furriner wrote:
Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.


Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?


He's working on the premise that none of them can reach Australia...


I believe they're working on the distance thingie. Smile

buckSH wrote:
furriner wrote:
Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.


Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?


the mafia boss may have 50 guns, but you still gotta take him out if he crosses the line.

moreover I do not think the majority of those nukes are high tonnage, most will be tactical battlefield types only. With a few being 10kt or so.
they don't have the testing history or research/industrial base to build high output fission devices.

India is an impotent and soft nation, and incapable of protecting their citizens both within and outside.


50 guns is a bit different from 50 nukes though.

And as for Pakistani nuke tonnage, I really have no clue.

furriner


Number of posts: 8656
Reputation: 20
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Shoeshine on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 06:10

Don't worry Aussies, we'll defend you.

Shoeshine



Number of posts: 4512
Age: 40
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-09-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by furriner on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 06:20

Possibly to the last Australian?

furriner


Number of posts: 8656
Reputation: 20
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Shoeshine on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 06:33

Preferably rather than possibly.

Mind you, it's always good to see the myth of the ANZACs being propagated again. If only those 80,000 British casualties had realised that so many Aussies and Kiwis were in front of them.

Shoeshine



Number of posts: 4512
Age: 40
Reputation: 16
Registration date: 2007-09-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by skully on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 11:23

Hehehe, typical FB thread. Starts off talking about flat decks in India killing Test Cricket, and morphs into nuclear war chat. shrug

skully


Number of posts: 56750
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by DJ_Smerk on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 12:37

skully wrote:Hehehe, typical FB thread. Starts off talking about flat decks in India killing Test Cricket, and morphs into nuclear war chat. shrug




It's so inane.

DJ_Smerk


Number of posts: 15628
Age: 24
Reputation: 20
Registration date: 2007-09-08
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by skully on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 13:01

Hehehe. Don't let the man beat you down, Smerky.

I like your inane posts. Twisted Evil

skully


Number of posts: 56750
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum