The bleeding obvious?

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The bleeding obvious?

Post by skully on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 17:41

Talk about stating the bleeding obvious (linky)...

BanIndians killing Test Cricket

"Dead pitches killing Tests in India

Why mouth platitudes about the sanctity of Test cricket when matches are played on pitches designed to drag the game off to the post-mortem table?"

Love this line...

"This is a series where the No. 1 ranking is at stake. You'd think that results mattered. But while Australia, South Africa and Sri Lanka leave little to chance as they pursue that ambition, India are content with being world leaders: at signing TV deals and producing bog-standard pitches."

skully


Number of posts: 56750
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Ash on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 17:58

you cant kill whats already dead.

Ash



Number of posts: 2000
Reputation: -4
Registration date: 2007-09-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Bradman on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 18:19

The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by tac on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 18:23

Just when you thought bradders couldn't get any loonier . . . FFS

tac


Number of posts: 19233
Reputation: 15
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Bradman on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 18:24

Hello Trollmeister.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by skully on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 19:14

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.

Eek!! Harsh in the extreme. Remind me not to vote for you if you go into Politics, qmy. Cool

skully


Number of posts: 56750
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Bradman on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 22:08

Unlikely to happen skulls. Vote for the trollmeister. Whack jobs like him are bound to gather a small deluded crowd. In fact he could run on a joint ticket with buckwit. The bumper stickers would be cool:

"Vote for tac. I haven't got a clue but I'll jump in every second day or so and tell you you're wrong"

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by tac on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 22:58

bradders doing his impersonation of Pavlov's dog . . .

tac


Number of posts: 19233
Reputation: 15
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Bradman on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 23:18

Yeah what's your excuse? Though you could tell me in Russian seeing as your forte seems to be foreign languages.

Actually Russian wouldn't be right as you forte seems to be dead languages. Aramaic this time tac. Perhaps Blackfoot Indian?

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by skully on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 23:21

Get a room, you two. loveisintheair

skully


Number of posts: 56750
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by Bradman on Fri 20 Nov 2009, 23:31

skully wrote:Get a room, you two.


Only if I've got my rabies shot skulls.

Bradman


Number of posts: 9493
Reputation: 1
Registration date: 2008-08-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by buckSH on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 00:50

you started getting periods ?

buckSH


Number of posts: 2277
Age: 48
Reputation: -6
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by buckSH on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 00:52

Bradman wrote:Unlikely to happen skulls. Vote for the trollmeister. Whack jobs like him are bound to gather a small deluded crowd. In fact he could run on a joint ticket with buckwit. The bumper stickers would be cool:

"Vote for tac. I haven't got a clue but I'll jump in every second day or so and tell you you're wrong"


now what in hell have I done to you ..

except speak the truth i.e.

buckSH


Number of posts: 2277
Age: 48
Reputation: -6
Registration date: 2009-04-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by furriner on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 03:46

Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.


Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?

furriner


Number of posts: 8656
Reputation: 20
Registration date: 2007-09-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The bleeding obvious?

Post by JKLever on Sat 21 Nov 2009, 03:48

furriner wrote:
Bradman wrote:The sooner Pakistan gets a nuke(well one that works) the better.


Eh? You have inside information that none of the 50 + (at least) nukes that Pakistan is already supposed to possess are in working condition?


He's working on the premise that none of them can reach Australia...

JKLever


Number of posts: 26566
Reputation: 141
Registration date: 2007-08-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum