Who is at fault?

Thanks JK.

DJ_Smerk wrote:

vilkrang wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:
I'm a good honest poster! I keep this place ticking over, regardless of quality.

If my favourite restaurant suddenly became flooded with annoying people and shit food, it would no longer be my favourite restaurant, regardless of whether it was still "ticking over".

We all post rubbish you nutter! Why does it make a difference when I post?



Vilks your posts are very similar to when LLL used to flag me up on my posting. Fark, the irony.

A quick glance at the front page sees threads such as "Who is at fault?", "Is Flaming Bails over the hill?", "The thread that everyone should post in", and I haven't even scrolled down yet.

Other than the occasional drunken rampage I'd like to think I add something to most discussions and I don't tend to start garbage discussions like the ones above just because I'm bored and want to keep the place "ticking over". What's worse is that the first two threads listed above seem to be about the same subject, so not only are you starting totally inane threads, you are starting multiple inane threads about the same thing.

So yeah, no real irony there dude.

He's got a point Smerk, one thread for your 'woe is the forum' would suffice.

vilkrang wrote:What's worse is that the first two threads listed above seem to be about the same subject, so not only are you starting totally inane threads, you are starting multiple inane threads about the same thing.

So yeah, no real irony there dude.

You are lucky you didn't have to read Laura's crap

JKLever wrote:He's got a point Smerk, one thread for your 'woe is the forum' would suffice.

He is Welsh though. You have to make allowances.

I didn't want to say it....

vilkrang wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:

vilkrang wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:
I'm a good honest poster! I keep this place ticking over, regardless of quality.

If my favourite restaurant suddenly became flooded with annoying people and shit food, it would no longer be my favourite restaurant, regardless of whether it was still "ticking over".

We all post rubbish you nutter! Why does it make a difference when I post?



Vilks your posts are very similar to when LLL used to flag me up on my posting. Fark, the irony.

A quick glance at the front page sees threads such as "Who is at fault?", "Is Flaming Bails over the hill?", "The thread that everyone should post in", and I haven't even scrolled down yet.

Other than the occasional drunken rampage I'd like to think I add something to most discussions and I don't tend to start garbage discussions like the ones above just because I'm bored and want to keep the place "ticking over". What's worse is that the first two threads listed above seem to be about the same subject, so not only are you starting totally inane threads, you are starting multiple inane threads about the same thing.

So yeah, no real irony there dude.

Nothing wrong with the threads, pal. Inane you say? Similar to your posts lately which have been taking a knock at every bumped thread or every non-cricket related thread. Seems your the only person with a problem.

Shoeshine wrote:

JKLever wrote:He's got a point Smerk, one thread for your 'woe is the forum' would suffice.

He is Welsh though. You have to make allowances.

And your English and I make allowances without even mentioning it?

DJ_Smerk wrote:

vilkrang wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:

vilkrang wrote:

DJ_Smerk wrote:
I'm a good honest poster! I keep this place ticking over, regardless of quality.

If my favourite restaurant suddenly became flooded with annoying people and shit food, it would no longer be my favourite restaurant, regardless of whether it was still "ticking over".

We all post rubbish you nutter! Why does it make a difference when I post?

Vilks your posts are very similar to when LLL used to flag me up on my posting. Fark, the irony.

A quick glance at the front page sees threads such as "Who is at fault?", "Is Flaming Bails over the hill?", "The thread that everyone should post in", and I haven't even scrolled down yet.

Other than the occasional drunken rampage I'd like to think I add something to most discussions and I don't tend to start garbage discussions like the ones above just because I'm bored and want to keep the place "ticking over". What's worse is that the first two threads listed above seem to be about the same subject, so not only are you starting totally inane threads, you are starting multiple inane threads about the same thing.

So yeah, no real irony there dude.

Nothing wrong with the threads, pal. Inane you say? Similar to your posts lately which have been taking a knock at every bumped thread or every non-cricket related thread. Seems your the only person with a problem.

Despite people agreeing with me LITERALLY on the same page.

And I've been making plenty of posts other than the ones you have described, you can't just make up facts to suit your argument.

Well, if everyone agrees with you, there's nothing more I can say on the matter.

DJ_Smerk wrote:

Shoeshine wrote:

JKLever wrote:He's got a point Smerk, one thread for your 'woe is the forum' would suffice.

He is Welsh though. You have to make allowances.

And your English and I make allowances without even mentioning it?

Indeed. But there's no need to call us "sir" any more.

DJ_Smerk wrote:Well, if everyone agrees with you, there's nothing more I can say on the matter.

Take it on the chin. It's not like Smerk v the forum is Lags v the forum is it now?

DJ_Smerk wrote:
I spoke to an Irish guy last night and he was disgusted.

Well, perhaps you shouldn't have been fingering your anus at the time.

To the thread Q...

It's obvious. BanIndia.