Trousers...why bother wear them at all?

The jockey on the right is definitely shopped.

NOBODY has jodhpurs like that.

Why bother? Some guys would look pretty silly at boardroom presentations without them...

Mind you, some guys look pretty silly at boardroom presentations even WITH them.

Do we really need this mysoginistic rubbish?

G.Wood wrote:Do we really need this mysoginistic rubbish?

I'd say not. Personally I don't even bother to post on threads I consider to be dross as it only tends to encourage the person who started it.

That is the trouble with the world today. People are happy to have their head in the sand.

Well, I think it's true that you should take an active stance against anything genuinely nasty, but when it comes to mildly irritating pisspoor threads on a cricket forum it's probably not really worth taking the trouble to respond. Quite often they're either trying to wind you up, or else the post was simply made without much proper thought. Not worth getting het up either way.

Can someone tell me whether that look is actually attractive, please. It just looks highly bizarre to me.

They forgot to ask whether of not their bums looked big in this.

eowyn wrote:Can someone tell me whether that look is actually attractive, please. It just looks highly bizarre to me.

The camel toe effect on the front would not be attractive

Somebody had to say it.

The natural reference to camel's toes, as uttered by a sobre David Dimbleby on any future wildlife programme concerning dromedaries, will never quite mean the same again ...

embee wrote:

eowyn wrote:Can someone tell me whether that look is actually attractive, please. It just looks highly bizarre to me.

The camel toe effect on the front would not be attractive

The twin humps you mean?

Those lasses look positively deformed. Have they each had specific booty and thigh roid injections???