Re: NZCPA stands up to BCCI

by OP Tipping on Sun 1 Mar 2009 - 19:51

"Instead, they prohibited their own players from playing for a side which had ICL players in it."

Tantamount to the same thing...

by Nath on Sun 1 Mar 2009 - 20:44

Ban India!

by Chandan on Mon 2 Mar 2009 - 0:12

OP Tipping wrote:"Instead, they prohibited their own players from playing for a side which had ICL players in it."

Tantamount to the same thing...

Of course! But how did they bully NZ here by withdrawing their own players? Didn't they bully their own players?

by taipan on Mon 2 Mar 2009 - 0:13

Chandan wrote:
OP Tipping wrote:"Instead, they prohibited their own players from playing for a side which had ICL players in it."

Tantamount to the same thing...

Of course! But how did they bully NZ here by withdrawing their own players? Didn't they bully their own players?

I think the point is that NZ didn't submit to the bullying.

by *Buckaroo* on Mon 2 Mar 2009 - 0:15

Chandan wrote:
OP Tipping wrote:"Instead, they prohibited their own players from playing for a side which had ICL players in it."

Tantamount to the same thing...

Of course! But how did they bully NZ here by withdrawing their own players? Didn't they bully their own players?

If a car hits a truck or a truck hits a car, it is always the trucks fault.

It is same with BCCI.

by Chandan on Mon 2 Mar 2009 - 1:14

taipan wrote:
Chandan wrote:
OP Tipping wrote:"Instead, they prohibited their own players from playing for a side which had ICL players in it."

Tantamount to the same thing...

Of course! But how did they bully NZ here by withdrawing their own players? Didn't they bully their own players?

I think the point is that NZ didn't submit to the bullying.

And what was the bullying in the first place?

by Zat on Mon 2 Mar 2009 - 6:24

Oh dear.

Not the subject, just the content.