• Home
  • FAQ
  • Search
  • Register
  • Memberlist
  • Usergroups
  • Log in

Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Flaming Bails :: Flaming Bails ::  The Flaming Bails Cricket Forum

Page 1 of 13 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Henry on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 00:28

Knocked off the bails with his gloves and then claimed that Neil Broom had been bowled. Cheat.

Henry


Number of posts: 21913
Reputation: 25
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by JGK on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 00:53

That sort of thing ended Greg Dyer's career.

JGK


Number of posts: 21038
Reputation: 28
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Red on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:02

I wondered why Broom hovered there after he was bowled. It was almost simultaneous but the point is Haddin's gloves shouldn't have been in front of the stumps, it's against the law.

Red


Number of posts: 8621
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Paul Keating on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:38

I didn't see it, is this a genuinely serious incident?

Paul Keating



Number of posts: 3299
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-10-25
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Red on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:40

Clarke thought he had Broom clean bowled. Replays suggested that it could have hit Haddin's gloves first. In any case his gloves were in front of the stumps which is against the rules and he would have known this. Broom lingered at the stumps but Haddin didn't admit his error. Looked like very poor sportsmanship.

Red


Number of posts: 8621
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Paul Keating on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:43

I thought gloves in front of the stumps is only illegal if you interfere with the batsmen or the ball.

Are you saying once the gloves past the line of the stumps it is automatically illegal?

Paul Keating



Number of posts: 3299
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-10-25
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by JGK on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:44

Gloves in front usually means you can't get a stumping. I didn't think it disqualified other dismissals.

Of course, if his gloves actually hit the stumps and they didn't withdraw the appeal then that is seriously poor.

JGK


Number of posts: 21038
Reputation: 28
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Paul Keating on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:48

Red wrote:Clarke thought he had Broom clean bowled. Replays suggested that it could have hit Haddin's gloves first. In any case his gloves were in front of the stumps which is against the rules and he would have known this. Broom lingered at the stumps but Haddin didn't admit his error. Looked like very poor sportsmanship.


Did the umpire give him out, or did he walk after lingering?

Did the players watch the replay as he was walking off and should Ponting have recalled him?

Paul Keating



Number of posts: 3299
Reputation: 7
Registration date: 2007-10-25
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Red on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:53

Paul Keating wrote:
Red wrote:Clarke thought he had Broom clean bowled. Replays suggested that it could have hit Haddin's gloves first. In any case his gloves were in front of the stumps which is against the rules and he would have known this. Broom lingered at the stumps but Haddin didn't admit his error. Looked like very poor sportsmanship.


Did the umpire give him out, or did he walk after lingering?

Did the players watch the replay as he was walking off and should Ponting have recalled him?


He lingered, then went and nobody could work out why. When they replayed the incident they worked out why he lingered after being bowled. According to Ian Chappell, the keeper's gloves aren't meant to be in front of the stumps according to the rules.

Red


Number of posts: 8621
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by WideWally on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 01:56

35.2 Clarke to Broom, OUT, Australia claw back, now there's a bit of controversy here, Clarke gets it to skid through on a good length, Broom makes a lot of room to cut but he's beaten for pace, the ball appears to clip the top of the off bail but replays indicate that Haddin had his gloves in front of the stumps before the ball could make contact. Did the ball actually hit the stumps? Did Haddin whip off the bails by mistake? Very inconclusive but no wonder Broom looked perplexed as he walked back
NT Broom b Clarke 29 (52m 50b 2x4 0x6) SR: 58.00
New Zealand 106/5 LRPL Taylor 30* (61b 3x4) MJ Clarke 4.2-0-10-1


WideWally



Number of posts: 4527
Reputation: 13
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by embee on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 03:03

Law 40.3

3. Position of wicket-keeper
The wicket-keeper shall remain wholly behind the wicket at the striker's end from the moment the ball comes into play until
(a) a ball delivered by the bowler
either (i) touches the bat or person of the striker
or (ii) passes the wicket at the striker's end

or (b) the striker attempts a run.

In the event of the wicket-keeper contravening this Law, the umpire at the striker's end shall call and signal No ball as soon as possible after the delivery of the ball.

embee


Number of posts: 15597
Reputation: 93
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by doremi on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 03:09

So Haddin is a cheat. Meh....

doremi


Number of posts: 9435
Age: 23
Reputation: -28
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by PeterCS on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 03:12

FMDWGAF

PeterCS


Number of posts: 26865
Reputation: 44
Registration date: 2008-05-22
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by Chivalry Augustus on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 03:14

NEWSFLASH: Brad Haddin is an Australian.

/thread.

Chivalry Augustus



Number of posts: 4103
Age: 24
Reputation: -35
Registration date: 2007-09-04
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Brad Haddin is a dirty rotten cheat

Post by PeterCS on Sun 01 Feb 2009, 03:15

DBSFAA

PeterCS


Number of posts: 26865
Reputation: 44
Registration date: 2008-05-22
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 13 • 1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Flaming Bails :: Flaming Bails ::  The Flaming Bails Cricket Forum

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum