Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

by Zat on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:17

ICC backflip on forfeiture complete

Apparently. Well done to the ICC for showing some spine.

by Invader Zim on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:33

What a farking joke.

I hope the Indian ****** ruin the ICC and it falls apart and we can go back to playing cricket against nations that have a basic understanding of fair play and the rule of law.

******.

by Invader Zim on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:35

ICC = Indian Controlled ******.

Fark em. ******.

by embee on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:40

I hope the Cricket Statisticians who refuse to acknowledge the SuperTest's Test status refuse to change the result of the Oval game ...definitely an asterisk

by G.Wood on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:55

They could have just kept everyone happy if the declared it a Moral Draw

by DJ_Smerk on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:12

I sulk all the time. I'm the Welsh equivalent of the ICC. God help you all.

by embee on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:17

DJ_Smerk wrote:I sulk all the time. I'm the Welsh equivalent of the ICC. God help you all.

When do the ICC rule that sheep are human?

by DJ_Smerk on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:32

embee wrote:
DJ_Smerk wrote:I sulk all the time. I'm the Welsh equivalent of the ICC. God help you all.

When do the ICC rule that sheep are human?

Have you seen New Zealand play cricket? or Paul Collingwood? They all follow the crowd/herd.

by Henry on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:32

Does anyone else sometimes wonder if it's worth following cricket? Sometimes I almost feel morally obliged to abandon the game thanks to the incompetence and weakness of the ICC.

by DJ_Smerk on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:32

Henry wrote:Does anyone else sometimes wonder if it's worth following cricket? Sometimes I almost feel morally obliged to abandon the game thanks to the incompetence and weakness of the ICC.

Why Bother Trev?

by skully on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:44

Bwahahahaha. As if we needed any confirmation. ICC are useless, ignorant, weak dolts, and the Paksters are the poutiest pouters this side of poutsville.

I wonder if the Zimbabwe delegate allowed the in-principle ruling to get up? Yeah, silly question, I know.

Subis embarrass the great game yet again.

by doremi on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:17

Invader Zim wrote:ICC = Indian Controlled ******.

Fark em. ******.

Yeah, except India had nothing whatsoever to do with it. But carry on with that - wait for it - chip on your shoulder.

by The One on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:38

skully wrote:Subis embarrass the great game yet again.

the english are subis? they do eat an awful lot of (not very good) curry

by Josh Carney on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:43

India have officially become the America of Cricket. Every thing gets blamed on them, but everybody needs them to keep World Cricket going.

by lardbucket on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:44

This decision has just about fukked world cricket.

A match is no longer in the control of the umpire, and it's no longer over when the last ball has been bowled.

Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.

Re: Your mother was wrong. Sulking WILL get you what you want.