Bung 3.0

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Bung 3.0

Post by skully on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:17

An analysis of Brett Lee's career makes for interesting reading. He came onto the scene with a bang v India in late 1999 after SRW "bigged him up". After a sensational start, he unravelled his elbow out making a return from the outfield v Windies in Perth in Dec 2000. This was the end of Bung 1.0. He then came back v England in Ashes 2001 and was pretty sh!te right through until the West Indies series in Aus in 2005/06 when he started to show much more consistency (as such I have used the World XI "Test" as the cut off for Bung 2.0, although many would argue that this period continued until after the retirement of TGM/tgm!!). Bung 3.0 is from 1 Nov 2005 until now. These periods give:

Bung 1.0 (Dec 1999 to Dec 2000) - 7 Tests 42 wickets @ 16.07 SR=16.07
Bung 2.0 (July 2001 to Oct 2005) - 43 Tests 161 wickets @ 33.04 SR=53.60
Bung 3.0 (Nov 2005 to June 2008) - 25 Tests 128 wickets @ 25.23 SR=47.80

skully


Number of posts: 56704
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Brass Monkey on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:20

He's still a dross-weasel cockmuncher who is shit against any team who can play pace alright.

Brass Monkey


Number of posts: 29379
Age: 103
Reputation: 210
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile Http://www.enkiuk.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by JGK on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:33

Brass Monkey wrote:He's still a dross-weasel cockmuncher who is shit against any team who can play pace alright.


Such as?

JGK


Number of posts: 21028
Reputation: 28
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Brass Monkey on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:37

England.

Brass Monkey


Number of posts: 29379
Age: 103
Reputation: 210
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile Http://www.enkiuk.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by JKLever on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:42

No doubt he's improved from 2005 though Moonkey...

JKLever


Number of posts: 26538
Reputation: 140
Registration date: 2007-08-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Brass Monkey on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:56

Deffo.

Brass Monkey


Number of posts: 29379
Age: 103
Reputation: 210
Registration date: 2007-09-02
Country:

View user profile Http://www.enkiuk.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Henry on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 21:57

Batsmen should stir him up a bit. Sledge him. Get him conned into bowling short at you all the time, with the occasional yorker, and he's easy pickings. He's only dangerous when he's relaxed and calm, and consistently bowling a good line and length.

Henry


Number of posts: 21913
Reputation: 25
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by skully on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:02

Meh, I think the opposition does target Bung these days, particularly when he's got a bat in his hand. The Windies (particularly Edwards) peppered him with short stuff and pegged him quite a few times. To his credit, he didn't complain. I reckon he respected the Windies quicks and vice versa.

skully


Number of posts: 56704
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by skully on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 22:02

Brass Monkey wrote:He's still a dross-weasel cockmuncher who is shit against any team who can play pace alright.

[snorfle] Eloquent.

skully


Number of posts: 56704
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by THICKEDGE on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 23:19

It was Tres who played him really well and he's not around any more.

THICKEDGE


Number of posts: 434
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by JKLever on Mon 16 Jun 2008, 23:20

Aye, Tres loved the brainless quickies.

MPV likes them too

JKLever


Number of posts: 26538
Reputation: 140
Registration date: 2007-08-06
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Anniyan on Tue 17 Jun 2008, 03:11

JKLever wrote:Aye, Tres loved the brainless quickies.


like gillespie?

Anniyan


Number of posts: 931
Age: 33
Reputation: 0
Registration date: 2007-09-08
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by Henry on Tue 17 Jun 2008, 03:39

More like Paris Hilton.....

Henry


Number of posts: 21913
Reputation: 25
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by PeterCS on Tue 17 Jun 2008, 05:09

She's a mock cruncher.

PeterCS


Number of posts: 26865
Reputation: 44
Registration date: 2008-05-22
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bung 3.0

Post by doremi on Tue 17 Jun 2008, 18:55

Lee's a different bowler from early on in his career, no doubt. Still there are phases when he goes back to his, 2.0 version, especially when being hit.

doremi


Number of posts: 9435
Age: 23
Reputation: -28
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum