VoR's Test Rankings

VoR's Other Test Ranking System

1st - Australia - currently defending 9 out of 9 series.
=2nd - England - currently defending 6 out of 9 series.
=2nd - India - currently defending 6 out of 9 series.
=2nd - South Africa - currently defending 6 out of 9 series.
=5th - New Zealand - currently defending 5 out of 9 series.
=5th - Pakistan - currently defending 5 out of 9 series.
=5th - Sri Lanka - currently defending 5 out of 9 series.
8th - West Indies - currently defending 2 out of 9 series.
9th - Bangladesh - currently defending 1 out of 9 series.
10th - Zimbabwe - currently defending 0 out of 9 series.

Oh dear. Don't let Peter Moores see that - he'll use it as evidence for what a bang-up job he's doing with his "developing team".

On track...

So basically India, England and SA suck, well, as hard as each other.

And NZ, Pak SL do the same, albeit at a slightly lower level.

Harsh. Fair. Etc.

I only live for the when that Australia goes to # five million and are squashed like bugs by Bangladesh, ha, ha, ha.

If the Yarpies win the up coming series against the Poms then they'll be outright second, with the Poms dropping to equal 4th.

Oi Zim - ever thought about giving each series defence some sort of statistical weighting? So if (for example) England are defending series' against Bang, NZ and WI they would be behind SA defending series' against Aus, Ind, NZ?

furriner wrote:
I only live for the when that Australia goes to # five million and are squashed like bugs by Bangladesh, ha, ha, ha.

Conf of hat low?

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:Oi Zim - ever thought about giving each series defence some sort of statistical weighting? So if (for example) England are defending series' against Bang, NZ and WI they would be behind SA defending series' against Aus, Ind, NZ?

No.

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:Oi Zim - ever thought about giving each series defence some sort of statistical weighting? So if (for example) England are defending series' against Bang, NZ and WI they would be behind SA defending series' against Aus, Ind, NZ?

I like it the way it is.

If SA had beaten Aus, Ind & NZ, but lost to Bang, NZ & WI would that make them a better team than England if we had beaten Bang, NZ & WI but lost to Aus, Ind & NZ?

Fair point.

England need IND,AUS & SL

Whose are Indias? AUS, SA & ?

Dello wrote:

furriner wrote:
I only live for the when that Australia goes to # five million and are squashed like bugs by Bangladesh, ha, ha, ha.

Conf of hat low?

What, you don't have your little dreams?

JKLever wrote:England need IND,AUS & SL

Whose are Indias? AUS, SA & ?

NZ I think.

And conf of hat very high, thank you much.

PearlJ wrote:

JKLever wrote:England need IND,AUS & SL

Whose are Indias? AUS, SA & ?

NZ I think.

Chorfle