Fallacies of 2020 cricket

Mick Sawyer wrote:

taipan wrote:

Mick Sawyer wrote:

I reckon I could pick the winner of about 90+% of games after 25 overs.

I reckon I can pick the winner of 90% of Test matches at the close of day 3 & 90% of JAMODIs after 65 overs.

True, but a lot of people might have got the 2 present tests wrong.

Yep, but you knew my point.

Yep and I agreed with you. It was just both these tests turned on their heads on day 4.

Mick Sawyer wrote:

I reckon I could pick the winner of about 90+% of games after 25 overs.

I reckon I can pick the winner of 90% of Test matches at the close of day 3 & 90% of JAMODIs after 65 overs.

I think you'd be wrong about the Tests (excluding minnows).

Phalluses of 2020 cricket:

1. Modi

Actually, that's wrong. He's still a qunt.

The great thing about Tests is the possibility of a draw.

It means that even if a team is getting the snot beaten out of it they can still potentially tough it out and hang on for a draw.

Limited Overs cricket removes this possibility and suffers for it. Such is life.