F*ck this for a barrell of $hite

Josh Carney wrote:

HH_pink wrote:

Josh Carney wrote:The point about clear skin is very valid. Instinctively most associate clear skin with better health irrespective of the level of melanin pigmentation.

And Dawkins' point is that the darker to skin the more difficult it becomes to spot things like moles, freckles, and even injuries, burns, etc.

That may be true. But the genes that lead to darker features are the hardy ones and the fairer ones are recessive . The darker genes will dominate the lighter ones in any copulation in a vast majority of cases since nature choose those dark genes as having the best chance to survive and breed further.

Accordingly the theory is that a preference for light features is a conditioning whereas a preference for the dark counterparts is more an instinct.

Interesting. Will have to look that up.

It ain't easy being white
It ain't easy being brown
All this pressure to be bright
I've got kids all over town

A foolish young man, of the Indian persuasion
Devoted his life, to become a Caucasian
He stopped eating pork, he stopped eating greens
He traded his dashiki, For some Jordache Jeans
He learned to play golf, and he got a good score
Now he says to himself
"I AIN'T NO SUBI NO MORE . . . HEY! HEY! HEY!"

That makes no sense whatsoever. That the intent?

HH, This link might be of intrest to you

dominant recessive features

Still trying to get my head around the whole concept of how not liking someone because of the colour of their skin isn't racism...

Invader Zim wrote:Still trying to get my head around the whole concept of how not liking someone because of the colour of their skin isn't racism...

It's aesthetics . . . pure and simple . . .

hmm.. actually I have another thesis. From detailed anal-ysis I have concluded that the color of skin has jack ..ha. to do with perception (which normal person will want to be classified as prejudiced?) but it is a deeper choice.

It's got to do with the functioning of the liver and the chemicals secreted from it. Melanin, the pigment is a result of such a secretion. So if people dislike dark-skinned people, then they are at a certain level subconsciously rejecting certain organic-functions associated with the person in question.

Blacks in general have a hyperactive liver as compared to whites. And this feature changes the entire body/aura/soul matrix.

Just so it is clear .. as a personal choice, I prefer clarified butter slurping blue men and women.

there is yet another theory ..

that Gods from different planets and dimensions created humans (using a common template: Called Adam?) various versions in their own image or vanity.

the ultimate objective being to see which species would win out in the end.

So it was but natural that one species would fight another for supremacy and space.

And one group would be perpetually dissatisfied with the other.

Yes kiddies, read Bucky's last post and know, drugs really are bad for you.....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7416692.stm

Link says girls are claiming the n-word was used.

Invader Zim wrote:Still trying to get my head around the whole concept of how not liking someone because of the colour of their skin isn't racism...

Boning other males doesn't float my boat - does this make me a homophobe then?

Lara Lara Laughs wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7416692.stm

Link says girls are claiming the n-word was used.

They weren't being racist though. The N-word is probably used as some sort of affectionate term in India.....

They were just being friendly.

Why would you feck a barrel of shite anyway?

Shiteist.