Re: Southee

by JKLever on Wed 26 Mar 2008, 08:48

Not to mention a decent lower order bat as well...

by DJ_Smerk on Sat 29 Mar 2008, 05:56

Southee=Hadlee?

by embee on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 04:04

TG Southee 10 0 105 0 10.50 (2w)

Maybe not Hadlee ...maybe Snedden

by SG on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 16:23

Atleast Snedden bowled 2 overs extra for conceding same no. of runs.

by DJ_Smerk on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 16:58

I still believe in Southee to come good eventually. Good action along with the potential to get decent swing (possibly reverse swing) in the future. His pace seemed very down against India in the last ODI in Christchurch. Although, that could be due to the road that was put out.

The guy needs to be persisted with. One p!ss poor ODI outing should not deter him from improving and moving on.

by Red on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 18:17

embee wrote:TG Southee 10 0 105 0 10.50 (2w)

Maybe not Hadlee ...maybe Snedden

Maybe Mickey Lewis.

by Chandan on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 19:09

SG wrote:Atleast Snedden bowled 2 overs extra for conceding same no. of runs.

I do not think any bowler apart from Munaf who bowled two consecutive beamers, needs to be criticised for bad performance in yesterday's ODI at Chistchuch. It was a very very unfair condition for bowlers!

by tac on Sun 08 Mar 2009, 19:14

Chandan wrote:
SG wrote:Atleast Snedden bowled 2 overs extra for conceding same no. of runs.

I do not think any bowler apart from Munaf who bowled two consecutive beamers, needs to be criticised for bad performance in yesterday's ODI at Chistchuch. It was a very very unfair condition for bowlers!

WTF? The (almost) consecutive beamers won the game for you . . . if munaf had continued to bowl it was all over, and the beamers were a clever way to get taken out of the attack mid-over . . . FFS, Chnadan!