I got a bruised Thigh!

See Dello, this is why we need a forum gold section.

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:Sh!tty search function won't allow me to track down the infamous blumpkin discussion thread.

I found it a few months back - it's quite well hidden, I think. There's no hint of the depravity contained within the thread in the title.

Aye, that's why it's so hard to find. But PdMSL when I read it last time.

Zat wrote:See Dello, this is why we need a forum gold section.

But how would it work? Would it just be a read-only archive or would the threads remain "live" and go on and on forever in the "sunshine lollypops" style? In which case, could their "gold" status be revoked if the thread degenerated into non-gold mediocrity?

My vote would be to lock them for posterity.

Dello wrote:

Zat wrote:See Dello, this is why we need a forum gold section.

But how would it work? Would it just be a read-only archive or would the threads remain "live" and go on and on forever in the "sunshine lollypops" style? In which case, could their "gold" status be revoked if the thread degenerated into non-gold mediocrity?

In my model (suggested in the poll) I've said they should be locked, in their pristine 'gold' state.

As an example, the 'Is it just me' thread would go in, with the post resurrection discussion removed.

It could almost be a Flaming Bails Hall of Fame.

Another fair suggestion for the name of the proposed new section.

skully wrote:

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:Sh!tty search function won't allow me to track down the infamous blumpkin discussion thread.

I found it a few months back - it's quite well hidden, I think. There's no hint of the depravity contained within the thread in the title.

Aye, that's why it's so hard to find. But PdMSL when I read it last time.

If you're still looking for it, it was a "flaming" thread, but I don't think it was really massive - maybe as few as nine pages.

Now that I think about it, I think the title was about David Graveney. That would make sense...

I'm on a roll.

Which beats being on a sandwich.

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:Sh!tty search function won't allow me to track down the infamous blumpkin discussion thread.

I found it a few months back - it's quite well hidden, I think. There's no hint of the depravity contained within the thread in the title.

Aye, that's why it's so hard to find. But PdMSL when I read it last time.

If you're still looking for it, it was a "flaming" thread, but I don't think it was really massive - maybe as few as nine pages.

Now that I think about it, I think the title was about David Graveney. That would make sense...

Actually it was a thread about the suicide emoticon. Nice one memory, you doddering idiot.

Dello wrote:

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:

Dello wrote:

skully wrote:Sh!tty search function won't allow me to track down the infamous blumpkin discussion thread.

I found it a few months back - it's quite well hidden, I think. There's no hint of the depravity contained within the thread in the title.

Aye, that's why it's so hard to find. But PdMSL when I read it last time.

If you're still looking for it, it was a "flaming" thread, but I don't think it was really massive - maybe as few as nine pages.

Now that I think about it, I think the title was about David Graveney. That would make sense...

Actually it was a thread about the suicide emoticon. Nice one memory, you doddering idiot.

Almost 100 pages of threads, not bad that you found it at all.

I thought this would be another thread about skully's brother . . .

skully wrote:Another fair suggestion for the name of the proposed new section.

Seconded

This thread had very unpromising beginnings (Anni talking about his cork) but I think it's where the 'forum gold' idea came from

Who'da thunk. Some attention whoring by Anni lead to Forum Gold.