Australia v India, 2nd T20, Melbourne, 3 February, 2012

[Mumbai fan]4-0? What is 4-0?[/Mumbai fan]

The One wrote:in your face australia. 4-0 already forgotten

**chuckle**

The One wrote:in your face australia. 4-0 already forgotten

another unsatisfying 1-1 series result

They kept going on about how four run outs must have been a record but didn't Australia have five run outs in the first WC final?

Marsh.S. is a waste of space but one also wonders how George Bailey after being pox in the BBL gets the captaincy gig here. He was the one who should have been dropped, not Birt.

Anyway the young Indians have certainly showed up their geriatic tests teammates in the field.

Zat wrote:

skully wrote:An anatomy of a crap T20 innings. Your star thumper goes early after having his successful partner dropped down the order, the crappest most out-of-form no.3 comes in and gets a duck, your late middle order hitter is sent in early to bolster but runs out two others. Then it's just a farce including the odd routine dismissal, the inevitable additaional run outs and very few cow shots. Result - a p!ss poor 130.

You say that like there's such a thing as good T20. It's shite...

exactly ... win or lose, it's still shite

Red wrote:They kept going on about how four run outs must have been a record but didn't Australia have five run outs in the first WC final?

Spectacular tits, dopey. How is a comparison between a 60-over-a-side ODI and a t20i shitefest possibly valid? For that matter, how would a comparison between any of the 7 or 8 other times a team has had 5 run outs in an ODI innings and a t20 match possibly be valid?

A comparison to the three or four (or five?) other times a team had suffered four run outs in a T20I would have made more sense, and underlined your point about the ineptitude of the Nein commentators just as effectively.

The One wrote:in your face australia. 4-0 already forgotten

Man, what a crap display Aus put in. Fell asleep in India's reply, as they tediously whittled away at the run target. Thoroughly crapulent spectacle all round.

skully wrote:

The One wrote:in your face australia. 4-0 already forgotten

Man, what a crap display Aus put in. Fell asleep in India's reply, as they tediously whittled away at the run target. Thoroughly crapulent spectacle all round.

You old f@rt, you're yesterday's man skulls. Living in the past. T20's where it's at, guaranteed excitement all round for a full forty overs...

Nah, couldn't keep it up and keep a straight face.

The One wrote:in your face australia. 4-0 already forgotten

In your face indeed. Weak Aussie farkers; acting up even though they lost long term (Tests), which I single-handedly won, despite what these flabby middle aged qunts may say.

What the f*ck is 4-0? Equally importantly who the f*ck is 4-0?

Meanwhile, the CA website continues to be as irrelevant as can be imagined.

This is on the front page...

KFC T20 INTL KFC T20 INTL

P Name M W L
1 Australia 2 1 1
2 India 2 1 1


Does anyone in CA marketing even GAF about cricket and the fans?

What an embarrassment that site has become.

JGK wrote:Meanwhile, the CA website continues to be as irrelevant as can be imagined.

This is on the front page...

KFC T20 INTL KFC T20 INTL

P Name M W L
1 Australia 2 1 1
2 India 2 1 1


Does anyone in CA marketing even GAF about cricket and the fans?

Do you really have to ask?

It is the worst website for a major sport in this country. Even many minor sports outshine it. Check out the Australian Baseball League site FFS, it's run on a shoestring budget, mostly by volunteers, but it sh!ts on CA's 'efforts'.