South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Red on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 13:44

Will be interesting to see the line-ups as it's another dead rubber. SA is experimenting, resting a lot of key players while Lanka has been forced to try some youngsters due to a couple of injuries. It's a day match at the venue of the famous 438 ODI but we haven't really seen a pitch to rival that since. SA's fielding cost it the last match so you imagine that Kirsten would expect an improvement in this area.

Geoff Marsh will be hoping that another consolation victory might help him avoid the axe.

Red


Number of posts: 8617
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by skully on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 15:32

Sleep

skully


Number of posts: 56681
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Zat on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 16:05

Red wrote:Will be interesting...

Um, no it won't.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent - Thomas Jefferson

Zat


Number of posts: 28538
Age: 102
Reputation: 73
Registration date: 2007-09-03
Country:

View user profile http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by taipan on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 19:17

Where is this being played?

taipan


Number of posts: 29835
Age: 111
Reputation: 55
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by skully on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 19:22

It's not Jo'burg? Dickinfo seems to think it is.

skully


Number of posts: 56681
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by taipan on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 19:44

Was trying to convey the lack of interest.

taipan


Number of posts: 29835
Age: 111
Reputation: 55
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by skully on Sat 21 Jan 2012, 19:45

columbo

I thought there may have been more than one international ground in Jo'burg.

skully


Number of posts: 56681
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by taipan on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 00:01

So Red, any comments on the Smith century?

taipan


Number of posts: 29835
Age: 111
Reputation: 55
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by skully on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 00:11

Dead rubber. Twisted Evil

skully


Number of posts: 56681
Age: 100
Reputation: 101
Registration date: 2007-08-30
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Red on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 01:12

taipan wrote:So Red, any comments on the Smith century?


Compared with AB's it was funereal. I really enjoyed the latter's audacious shots, especially towards the end. SA might have made more had Albie come in earlier. AB looked stuffed so keeping and skippering will be tough for him. Petersen doesn't look like an ODI opener.

Red


Number of posts: 8617
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by taipan on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 01:14

So Smith cocked up by not getting out earlier. I agree a strike rate of 90+ is pathetic.

taipan


Number of posts: 29835
Age: 111
Reputation: 55
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Red on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 01:24

BTW, something to gladden your heart, de Kock has scored 146 opening in the final of the Pakistan/SA triangular series against the Paksters.

And back to your point, a little more Albie and you probably would have set 350. 300 is not foolproof at this venue. Think Sooky would do well to drop the sweep shot and try to use his power to get the boundaries.

Red


Number of posts: 8617
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by taipan on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 01:36

I Am tempted to bring him into the ODI side already

taipan


Number of posts: 29835
Age: 111
Reputation: 55
Registration date: 2007-08-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Red on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 02:32

taipan wrote:I Am tempted to bring him into the ODI side already


Why not? - AB goes back to the outfield, you ease a youngster into international cricket, gain a keeper and an aggressive batsmen.

Match delayed by storms after Lankans come out of the blocks with alacrity.

Red


Number of posts: 8617
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: South Africa v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Johannesburg, 22 January, 2012

Post by Red on Sun 22 Jan 2012, 02:57

Marsh sacked as coach and he'll be replaced by Ford from SA. Coaches from Africa seems to be a bit of a trend in world cricket.

Red


Number of posts: 8617
Reputation: 3
Registration date: 2007-10-28
Country:

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum