Aw Shucks, fellas

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:03

In no particular order, a selection of today's posts....

horace wrote:aah well these terrible times bring out the loon in some people...look at recent skully posts for an example of an otherwise decent cricket nut wigging out...however the loony christian right tends to take the cake or the armageddon at these times...

the lowlight in the past few days has been the Oz nuclear/uranium spokesman Zwitkowski who has proclaimed that events in Japan have shown that nuke power is the safe alternative...admittedly he has gone rather quiet in the past 24 hours..

you cannot trust right wingers and capos from the nuke indiustry....

horace wrote:bullying is a dreadful damaging phenomenon...but prolly one that is integral to human beings...look what being bullied has done to skully

Zat wrote:
skully wrote:I am the lone voice against the tide of loony pinkos.

Just like Bucky was the lone voice of sanity and Vikas is the lone voice of humour.

Zat wrote:
skully wrote:before passing such sanctimonious judgment, have a look at your own recent behaviour

Pot, meet kettle...

skulls, any time anyone posts anything you slightly disagree with in the political arena, you carry on like a two year old. Toys out of the cot, the whole catastrophe, and your first (and almost exculsive) tactic is to accuse anyone else of your own worst faults. Change the record, mate.

horace wrote:skullster[Clearly you have come to the point that, "Ah, that skulls, he's a bit like AD". ]

finally a moment of lucid insight.....

G.Wood wrote:
JGK wrote: A massive Coalition win wouldn't be that good for Big Bad Baz because he simply won't have enough jobs to keep his backbenchers occupied. Just sitting in Parliament isn't really a full time job.

Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with

horace wrote:only if the skully snout gets access to the trough

Zat wrote:
G.Wood wrote:
JGK wrote: A massive Coalition win wouldn't be that good for Big Bad Baz because he simply won't have enough jobs to keep his backbenchers occupied. Just sitting in Parliament isn't really a full time job.

Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with

Not a bad idea. It'd cut skully's post count considerably. There's no way he would be able to make as many comments when typing with one hand.

Hass wrote:
Zat wrote:
G.Wood wrote:
Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with

Not a bad idea. It'd cut skully's post count considerably. There's no way he would be able to make as many comments when typing with one hand.

I wouldn't be too sure. That handicap might be overcome by his pulse rate going into overdrive.

JGK wrote:But could skully's heart survive the multiple orgasms that he would have in the first 10 minutes?

horace wrote:lol.... warner and hughes...our new tubs and slats, lawry and redders, bnlg and mtb...skully will be delighted

horace wrote:he appointed BB as Minister for Aged Care (for skully's benefit)

he did one good thing - initiated the guns buy back scheme...but of course disgraced himeself in the process by being an abject coward at various rallies.

Discuss

horace wrote:so where are the forum's ljh pawnd lapdogs - Big Dog, Embee, Skully and the little chichuaua - RD - Time to come running yapping and slathering over the dross that is the memory of ljh

All this attention today, and it's not even my birthday. I'm getting a little teary that you missed me so. Although horrie and Zog appear to have a little man love going on in my direction. Sorry fellas, I'm not that way inclined, but you could hook up with each other.
Laughing

There's also the obligatory sausage fingers double post from the Colostomy Bag Kid - nice one, h. Cool

by taipan on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:15

At last the search function works.

Although it's a bit anal to search for yourself.

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:17

Nah, I was catching up on today's posts after a long day and couldn't help but chuckle at horrie and Zog's fascination with me. horrie, in particular, was in overdrive.

Lumped 'em all in one post rather than bother replying to the drivel. Cool

Disappointed you didn't get a mention, taips? As they say, it's when they stop talking about you that you need to worry. Laughing

by taipan on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:19

skully wrote:
Disappointed you didn't get a mention, taips?

No, I have my own stalkers.

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:20

I was a little disappointed that Zimmy wasn't among the salivating masses. Hehehe, they're a bit sad, ay? Cool

And kudos to Mick, qmy and Ponts, who seemed to have recovered their decorum and didn't join in the "fun" in my absence.

by Fred Nerk on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:38

Murali shucks!!!

by Bradman on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 21:52

skully wrote:In no particular order, a selection of today's posts....

horace wrote:aah well these terrible times bring out the loon in some people...look at recent skully posts for an example of an otherwise decent cricket nut wigging out...however the loony christian right tends to take the cake or the armageddon at these times...

the lowlight in the past few days has been the Oz nuclear/uranium spokesman Zwitkowski who has proclaimed that events in Japan have shown that nuke power is the safe alternative...admittedly he has gone rather quiet in the past 24 hours..

you cannot trust right wingers and capos from the nuke indiustry....
horace wrote:bullying is a dreadful damaging phenomenon...but prolly one that is integral to human beings...look what being bullied has done to skully

Zat wrote:
skully wrote:I am the lone voice against the tide of loony pinkos.

Just like Bucky was the lone voice of sanity and Vikas is the lone voice of humour.
Zat wrote:
skully wrote:before passing such sanctimonious judgment, have a look at your own recent behaviour

Pot, meet kettle...

skulls, any time anyone posts anything you slightly disagree with in the political arena, you carry on like a two year old. Toys out of the cot, the whole catastrophe, and your first (and almost exculsive) tactic is to accuse anyone else of your own worst faults. Change the record, mate.
horace wrote:skullster[Clearly you have come to the point that, "Ah, that skulls, he's a bit like AD". ]

finally a moment of lucid insight.....
horace wrote:skullster[Clearly you have come to the point that, "Ah, that skulls, he's a bit like AD". ]

finally a moment of lucid insight.....
G.Wood wrote:
JGK wrote: A massive Coalition win wouldn't be that good for Big Bad Baz because he simply won't have enough jobs to keep his backbenchers occupied. Just sitting in Parliament isn't really a full time job.

Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with
horace wrote:only if the skully snout gets access to the trough
Zat wrote:
G.Wood wrote:
JGK wrote: A massive Coalition win wouldn't be that good for Big Bad Baz because he simply won't have enough jobs to keep his backbenchers occupied. Just sitting in Parliament isn't really a full time job.

Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with

Not a bad idea. It'd cut skully's post count considerably. There's no way he would be able to make as many comments when typing with one hand.
Hass wrote:
Zat wrote:
G.Wood wrote:
Perhaps they could be introduced to Flaming Bails. At least it would be someone for skully to agree with

Not a bad idea. It'd cut skully's post count considerably. There's no way he would be able to make as many comments when typing with one hand.

I wouldn't be too sure. That handicap might be overcome by his pulse rate going into overdrive.
JGK wrote:But could skully's heart survive the multiple orgasms that he would have in the first 10 minutes?
horace wrote:lol.... warner and hughes...our new tubs and slats, lawry and redders, bnlg and mtb...skully will be delighted

horace wrote:he appointed BB as Minister for Aged Care (for skully's benefit)

he did one good thing - initiated the guns buy back scheme...but of course disgraced himeself in the process by being an abject coward at various rallies.

Discuss
horace wrote:so where are the forum's ljh pawnd lapdogs - Big Dog, Embee, Skully and the little chichuaua - RD - Time to come running yapping and slathering over the dross that is the memory of ljh

All this attention today, and it's not even my birthday. I'm getting a little teary that you missed me so. Although horrie and Zog appear to have a little man love going on in my direction. Sorry fellas, I'm not that way inclined, but you could hook up with each other.

There's also the obligatory sausage fingers double post from the Colostomy Bag Kid - nice one, h.

So pretty much unanimous then on your current state of mind.

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 22:35

Now now qmy, you were doing so well. No need to let your redneck tendencies sneak out. Don't be jealous that no one was talking about you. Laughing

by Brass Monkey on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 22:55

Aww, c'mon Vikas, don't get like that again.

Oh, skully, it's you, **ahem** SIUYSGDT

by lardbucket on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:04

It was a frighteningly long post ... looked like an Allan or Vikas effort, at first glance.

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:07

lardbucket wrote:It was a frighteningly long post ... looked like an Allan or Vikas effort, at first glance.

Sorry lardy, I merely captured all the posts having a dig at me today in one spot. You don't have to read them. Generally, it revolves around "skully being a qunt" or somesuch. The length of the post is apparently proportional to the amount of red necked pinko anger I have generated in the past few days. Laughing

But you'll be pleased to note that at no point did Ange join in, nor did I mention her. Cool

by Brass Monkey on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:10

Maybe if a lot of peeps are disagreeing with your posts you should pull your rabid head out of your arse

by skully on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:13

Brass Monkey wrote: Maybe if a lot of peeps are disagreeing with your posts you should pull your rabid head out of your arse

Not so much disagreeing, Dan, but just outright abusing me. But it's great fun imagining people heads about to explode (espesh good ol' horrie and rabid Zat) as they post hostile invectives in my direction. The irony in this case is that I wasn't around all day - this is a collection of the posts made with me as the subject with absolutely no digging, poking or prodding from me. Hilarious stuff. You wish to join in? Laughing

by taipan on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:26

Brass Monkey wrote:
Aww, c'mon Vikas, don't get like that again.

Oh, skully, it's you, **ahem** SIUYSGDT

I have just neg repped the first post

by vilkrang on Tue 15 Mar 2011, 23:35

skully wrote:
Brass Monkey wrote: Maybe if a lot of peeps are disagreeing with your posts you should pull your rabid head out of your arse

Not so much disagreeing, Dan, but just outright abusing me. But it's great fun imagining people heads about to explode (espesh good ol' horrie and rabid Zat) as they post hostile invectives in my direction. The irony in this case is that I wasn't around all day - this is a collection of the posts made with me as the subject with absolutely no digging, poking or prodding from me. Hilarious stuff. You wish to join in?

I think that's the thing, it's all in your imagination... I highly doubt anyone mentioned in this thread is "rabid" as you imply every other post.

You asked if I thought you were like AD in another thread, to be honest you are acting more like bucky at the moment, this thread in particular is a bit mental....

Aw Shucks, fellas

Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas

Re: Aw Shucks, fellas