Coatness?

In an attempt to get Frommie to add this worth scale to the Glossary...

Current Depths of Coatness Scale for how quickly you should get your coat due the badness of a pun:

- responding to the offer of the tray with the pearl-handled revolver
- immediate with shame radiating from ear to ear
- immediate and without looking back
- immediate but with a parting glance
- saunter with a smirk
- stroll with a grin
- walking backwards with a wave
- walking backwards slowly, with a wave and a standing O.

Now I'm sure his lardship will want to have a say, but as the founding editor of the glossary, I am not sure this is glossary-worthy yet. With the exception of topbottom (which wasn't my fault, and sparked a sh!t*) the criteria has been common usage.

A sh!t*?

skully wrote:In an attempt to get Frommie to add this worth scale to the Glossary...

Skully doing a Laura impersonation?

skully wrote:A sh!t*?

Stupid forum won't let 'sh!tfight' go unedited.

Well, at least Depth of Coatness is worth a mention if lardarse and Zogarse are revisting the Glossary.

skully wrote:In an attempt to get Frommie to add this worth scale to the Glossary...

Current Depths of Coatness Scale for how quickly you should get your coat due the badness of a pun:

- responding to the offer of the tray with the pearl-handled revolver
- immediate with shame radiating from ear to ear
- immediate and without looking back
- immediate but with a parting glance
- saunter with a smirk
- stroll with a grin
- walking backwards with a wave
- walking backwards slowly, with a wave and a standing O.

Did this ever get added?

Not sure I approve if it did...

I thought this a worthy concept.

That's not enough, sorry, skulls ... someone else has to think so too

Harsh but fair.